I don’t care about Super Bowl ads. Not even a little. Maybe it’s because I live in Canada, so I don’t see most of the ads. Maybe it’s because I spend a lot of time doing marketing work, and understand how profoundly unscientific advertising is. Maybe it’s because I don’t think 30-second ads are an important entertainment medium.
Other people love to endlessly analyze and criticize these ads, and I don’t know why. I’d rather talk (and think!) about something other than advertising.
DarrenBarefoot.com 
Personally, I just don’t care about the Superbowl. If I wanted to watch men in tight pants bend over, I’d drop my change in Club Monaco.
Glad to see you’re feeling better.
“I Don’t Care About Super Bowl Ads”
I don’t care about super bowl; heck I don’t even care about NHL as well. It’s all commercialized and I don’t subscribe to this fake sense of pride, etc.
i haven’t watched super bowl ads before, but i have to admit that i get quite a kick out of the world’s best commercials that play at the ridge (before they closed down)
To be fair, the average 30-second TV commercial costs more money to produce and contains more entertainment value than almost every single 90- to 120-minute Hollywood movie. Commercials are the best (short) films out there; for many of them, if you chop off the product shot in the last three seconds, you have a fine short film. If only it weren’t so …
Johnny: I disagree with every aspect of your comment.
* Where’s your evidence to support your allegation that the average commercial costs more tan the average Hollywood movie?
* How will we measure entertainment value? In laughs? The average commercial has, at best, three laughs. The average Hollywood movie has, well, more than three.
* How many actual short films have you seen recently? Do you really think the average Mazda (as in ‘zoom zoom’) or Tide ad is better than the average short film?