Link Round-Up: Stuff What I Dun Found

Just various things I wanted to point to:

  • Tod Maffin has written a
    promising-looking essay on the future of public radio
    . I don’t listen
    to the radio, but he’s got some cool diagrams, so I’ll give it a read. Plus,
    he’s registered a domain for the essay, so he must be serious. I think Tod
    should run CBC radio some day–he’s more passionate about it than anybody
    I know.
  • Norlinda tells a
    charming story
    about her grandmother’s regular disdain for her medicine:
    "She’s lived through a World War, enemy occupation of her country, near
    starvation, an abusive husband, and she still managed to raise 8 kids. We
    don’t know how her body will react without all those pills, but who’s to say
    she won’t be fine?"
  • Kris proposes event
    blogging
    as a business model. Essentially, he’d be a special kind of documentary-maker,
    capturing the zeitgeist of a conference or convention with photos and words.
    Not a bad idea, but nonessential for conference planners, so he should do
    a good job of articulating the added value. Also, he should go register eventblogging.com.
  • Apparently these are colour
    photos from World War I
    . I have no proof whether they’re legit or colourized,
    nor do I have time to seek proof. Nonetheless, they’re pretty remarkable,
    and remind me of the aesthetic of Un
    Long Dimanche de Fiançailles
    .
  • The unpredictable Dave Pollard writes a post on, of all things, what
    to do if you find an injured animal
    . Apparently "shoot it" is
    not an option. I joke, but he fails to cover the scenario where-in an animal
    is beyond help, and you need to end its suffering.
  • Via Iridescent
    Spoke
    , this attractive-but-gutted-by-fire heritage building in downtown
    Charlottetown sold
    for a mere $70,000
    . In Vancouver, that buys you a ride in the elevator of most condo buildings.

2 comments

  1. Having a “heritage” building in Charlottetown is usually a big hassle, unless you have deep pockets. Any building over x years old (I think it’s 100) gets designated as one. Many of them aren’t taken good care of during that time, so you end up with a place that has to be gutted anyway.

    Oh and add an extra layer of red tape to simple additions or modifications.

Comments are closed.