As all the digital rights geeks know, today is Grey
Tuesday:
Danger Mouse created a remix of Jay-Z’s the Black Album
and the Beatles White Album, and called it the Grey Album (check this
cool album cover). Jay-Z’s record label, Roc-A-Fella, released an a
capella version of his Black Album specifically to encourage remixes like this
one. But despite praise from music fans and major media outlets like Rolling
Stone ("an ingenious hip-hop record that sounds oddly ahead of its time")
and the Boston Globe (which called it the "most creatively captivating"
album of the year), EMI has sent cease and desist letters demanding that stores
destroy their copies of the album and websites remove them from their site.
EMI claims copyright control of the Beatles 1968 White Album.
Today, sites everywhere are hosting the music for 24 hours in protest of the
music industry’s ridiculously antiquated approach to copyright. Lots of people
have written articulately about this:
- Downhill Battle
- A
Whole Lot of Nothing - Waxy.org
- BoingBoing
- Danger Mouse’s site
- Wired
– ""I’m just worried … whether Paul and Ringo will like it. If
they say that they hate it, and that I messed up their music, I think I’ll
put my tail between my legs and go," Danger Mouse recently told The New
Yorker."
But is it any good? As somebody who grew up on the Beatles, it’s kind of fascinating
to here their melodies used so originally. As I
mentioned a while back, I never felt like I could relate to rap. I still
feel that way, but this project has made it a little accessable. The mix of
Jay-Z’s ’99 Problems’ and the Beatles’ ‘Helter Skelter’ is a raging tirade,
capturing the edginess of the original track. ‘Rocky Racoon’ will never be the
same for me. I wouldn’t listen to music like this regularly, but I’m glad somebody’s
fighting for the right to do so.
Oh, by the way, here’s
the album (once it uploads).
The album is definitely interesting (I’ve had it for about a week now), but I can definitely only take it in small doses. I’ve never been a huge fan of rap music, but it’s fun to try to “name that tune”.
I have two copies of the original edition of this. Sadly, DM didn’t use the cool cover art on his “promotional” release, it’s just a plain grey cover with DangerMouse on the front and “For Promotional Use Only” on the back.
I have a hard time with this one. Yes, the music industry is a bunch of old fogies stuck in the tech of the 70s, but does that make this particular album right?
Why is it OK for this person to blatantly steal an entire album’s worth of music? He didn’t pay The Beatles (or their current holding company) anything for the right to use their ENTIRE ALBUM. Is it OK because the music is more than 30 years old? Is it OK because he’s added new tracks over it?
I don’t think it is, and I have a hard time supporting this one. I think the Beatles people are right to shut this one down.
-Augie